Letters
to the editor from this week's Chronicle:
Redneck Review
No. 80 10/31/2016
Finally! Election day is now about one week away, and the frantic campaigning
and name calling will soon come to an end! Unless... we are hit with another
Florida "hanging chad" controversy which delayed the actual decision on
the electoral votes cast to 12/13/2000, a result which involved a decision
of both the Florida Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States
in the Gore-Bush campaign, resulting in Bush's very narrow victory!
So what are some of the important considerations which can impact the
results of this election? It is claimed here that several factors can and
will determine the final outcome!
1) How many voters will look to the past with the tremendous success
our Constitutional system has had over the first years of our history,
placing responsibility on the individual vs. the current socialist popularity
of dependence on government for cradle to grave security?
2) What percentage of voters will stand firm on the protection of life
before birth vs. the more modern notion that parental convenience outweighs
the right to life of the most dependent and helpless unborn child.
3) How many Americans will consider valuable our right to bear arms
as guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment vs. those who erroneously believe that
taking away private firearms will somehow magically reduce random
killings and murders.
4) The number of voters who are legitimately concerned about the make
up of the Supreme Court, knowing that one candidate has pledged to nominate
men with the mentality of our recent justice Scalia who steadfastly made
decisions based on the Constitution vs. the other candidate who publically
ignores the Constitution and will appoint judges on the current wishes
of the people, or perhaps more accurately, on the wishes of the people
in power! This could well be the most important result of this year's election,
as the winner will have the opportunity to appoint anywhere from one to
several current members, determining the Court's decisions for decades
to come, and the very future of our United States.
5) Then there is the matter of the liberal press. Fortune magazine
summarizes the opinion of a majority of studies in saying "Study after
study has shown that the mainstream media leans left, and that an almost
overwhelming fraction of journalists are liberal." Further research makes
the same claim about the big TV stations, though the emergence of Fox News
and some few other TV sites and talk radio stations suggest a resurgence
of the conservative point of view. This is important, because the vast
majority of voters depend on the popular TV news stations and the regular
press, and are reluctant or even refuse to listen to contrary conservative
news. This needs to be kept in mind when every tiny misstep in one candidate's
behavior or speech makes headline news, whereas the sordid history of the
other candidate tends to be minimized or ignored!
6) The same skepticism should be applied to the on going polls which
constantly project who will win in the elections next week! The majority
of polls today put Clinton ahead of Trump as much as 8-12%, yet a 10/22
poll by Investors Business Daily gives a 42-40% edge to Trump, a poll that
will not appear normally in the daily press! Older folks like myself will
never forget the last poll in the 1948 presidential contest between Tom
Dewey and Harry Truman which put Dewey ahead by five points, causing the
Chicago Tribune to publish the headline the next day, "Dewey wins!" only
to have to quickly withdraw all those papers, showing the final results,
Dewey - 45% and Truman - 50%, making Truman president!
One final thing! Research shows that Evangelical Protestants consistently
vote Republican, while Catholics vote Democrat! Could it be that Catholics
will determine this election? After all, the abortion issue alone should
force Catholics away from a Democratic vote this year!! ?
Jake Wren
Letter to editor
("Appears like outside big money?") is making a big push to tarnish
and ruin one of the best Sheriffs Idaho County has had. For the last
8 years Doug Giddings experience and dedication to "The Folks" is what
we need in a sheriff, he has and will stand for you when the feds push
too hard. And their pushing more then we realize. It would be a dirty
shame to let lies and innuendos keep a good man from continuing serving
as our sheriff. Vote Doug Giddings Nov. 8
Margaret Arnzen
Cottonwood
To the Editor
Doug Giddings is a constitutional sheriff and one of the best in the
State of Idaho.
Having been a senator for 6 years, I have dealt with Sheriff Giddings
in my work. Sheriff Giddings has testified at the Idaho State
Capitol against EPA overreach on important issues. He personally
will defend you against anything that is unconstitutional, as many have
witnessed in our County. There is more than one business surviving
because of Sheriff Giddings’ authority against tribal and EPA harassment.
I have used Sheriff Giddings’ insight on the Senate floor in my debates
to stand against sending state control of law enforcement over to federal
control. We are safer here in Idaho County because of our current
sheriff. We know that he supports our rights. Can
we really get any better?
Please vote for Sheriff Giddings.
Sheryl Nuxoll
Raúl Labrador Endorses Sheriff Doug Giddings
Representative Raul Labrador last week endorsed Sheriff Doug Giddings
for Idaho County Sheriff. In a statement, Labrador said:
"Sheriff Doug Giddings is one of Idaho's best sheriffs. His commitment
to running a top notch department over the past 8 years proves he deserves
another term in office. Sheriff Giddings has demonstrated to the
citizens of Idaho County that he’s the kind of conservative leader we need
to keep in office. He's invested his best efforts to train his deputies
and staff to provide outstanding service and quality protection to the
people in Idaho County and I'm proud to support him."
To the Editor
We’ve known Sheriff Doug Giddings for a number of years and we’ve always
found him to be a man of integrity, competence and dedication! We
highly recommend that he be retained as Idaho County Sheriff.
Charlotte and Don DeArmond
Grangeville
To the Editor
Pricilla Giddings, Republican, is running for State Representative
for Idaho Dist. 7A. She is a retired fighter pilot and seems to be
a gutsy lady. I think she would do a great job. She is not afraid to tackle
a challenge when faced with it. She has what it takes to make a good representative.
Vote for Pricilla Giddings for State Representative.
Donna Wassmuth
Greencreek
To the Editor,
Unless you want a Sheriff like David Ward of Harney County, Oregon…who
conspired with the FBI and Facilitated the murder of LaVoy Finnicum…vote
for Doug Giddings. He will keep the reigns on the Feds and will NOT
allow them to run rampant over the citizens of Idaho County. Had
Ward been a sheriff like Doug Giddings, no one would have lost their lives
and the whole matter would have been settled quietly and peacefully without
making national headlines.
Betty Alm
Dear Editor
Idaho County Sheriff Carlos Martinez--------sounds really good to me!
Integrity, Honesty, Leadership. Born and raised in Idaho County, he knows
us and what we need from a sheriff. Cooperation and coordination with other
local law enforcement agencies to better protect us and our Constitutional
rights will top priority. Please give him your vote Nov. 8. Thanks
Lucky Brandt
Kooskia
Letter to the editor,
Hats off to Idaho Senator Mike Crapo in his incredible courage in withdrawing
his support for Donald Trump’s race for the White House. The Idaho County
Republican Central Committee has done a grave disservice to the Republican
Party and Democracy by trying to censor and silence the Senator.
Trump holds two GOP primary records - most votes for him at 13,300,420
and most votes against him at 15,284,155. The votes tallied against him
were only for Cruz, Kasich and Rubio. It does not include the other 13
challengers. So how did we end up with a presidential candidate who didn’t
even receive 50% of the primary votes cast?
Senator Mike Crapo joins a growing list of more than 160 national republican
leaders in declaring their refusal to support Trump.
Trump has violated the established principles of governance by exploiting
a weakness of Democracy, whipping up the passions of the crowd and shutting
down reasoned deliberation. Trump has exploited prejudices and ignorance
among the masses advocating violent actions to address national insecurities
while accusing moderate and thoughtful opponents of weakness and disloyalty.
Trump fits the term Demagogue to a tee. The label of a demagogue ties
in with Trump’s narcissistic and erotic personality in which he is
only interest in himself. History shows us that this kind of personality
is usually destructive in office driven by unyielding, arrogance, self
absorption and the need for power.
With a personality like Trump’s, a bully who verbally and sexually
assaults women (calling some women pigs and grabbing and fondling their
breasts and genitalia without their permission), it’s beyond belief that
he has made it this far in running for the highest office in America.
Now that Trump’s true personality is finally being vetted by the media
(who were responsible for creating his candidacy in the first place), he
cries that the system is rigged and against him.
Unreflective that his reputation with his lack of business ethics and
lack of moral values has finally caught up with him, he continues to lash
out at the system that has allowed him to thrive in the first place.
I’m wondering if in the distant future the word “Trump” will be added
to the dictionary to describe a political con artist like the word Ponzi
describes an investment scheme?
Jim Reed
Hood River, Oregon |
Home
Classified
Ads
Template Design by:
|