Letters
to the editor from this week's Chronicle:
To the Editor
The Right to Life of Idaho (“RTLI”) state board of directors has taken
the unanimous position that it opposes Medicaid Expansion on the sole basis
that it will be used to expand backdoor funding and opportunities for additional
abortion services, abortion-causing drugs, and additional funding to Planned
Parenthood.
Medicaid presently covers contraceptive services under the Idaho state
plan. With Medicaid Expansion, thousands more women will have access
to contraceptives through Planned Parenthood, as Planned Parenthood is
eligible to receive Medicaid funds. Many of these contraceptives known
as the “morning after” or “emergency contraceptive drugs” are potential
abortion-causing drugs—otherwise known as abortifacients.
The difference between preventing life and destroying life is extremely
significant to many women. Women deserve to know that difference.
The expansion in government funding will serve to expand Planned Parenthood’s
ability to increase abortion services, including funding for these potential
abortifacients at taxpayer expense.
The majority of Idaho people stand for life and support the prolife
position that all life is sacred. They support efforts to maintain life
in every way possible, especially when it comes to the spending of funds
for healthcare. Let us be wary of an out-of-state promoted and funded
solution, which will line the pockets of Planned Parenthood and grant Planned
Parenthood more ability to provide for abortion services and abortion-causing
drugs. The “devils in the details,” so please know the facts before you
vote.
Healthcare for a mother and her unborn child should never include killing
her unborn child by abortion, and Idaho’s taxpayers should never be forced
to pay for abortion-causing drugs.
This November, please vote No on Proposition 2, Medicaid Expansion
in Idaho for the sake of the “poor” disenfranchised and choice-less children
in the womb.
Kerry Uhlenkott
Legislative Coordinator
Right to Life of Idaho
431 Denver RD
Grangeville, Id 83530
Redneck Review!
No. 176 - 9/3/18
Ever hear of the "Maunder Minimum" or the "Dalton" Minimum? Or
"Sun Hibernation" theory? Or have you heard anything recently about
the "Medieval Maximum"?
It is safe to say today that unless you are out of the "Politically
Correct" loop, all of the above and then some others are totally unknown
to you!
So what are the easily researched periods above? The Maunder
Minimum is the name given to the period roughly from 1650 to 1700 when
temperatures dropped dramatically, caused by reduced sun spot activity,
scientifically called "Sun hibernation"! The Dalton Minimum?
A similar cold period roughly from 1790 to 1820. Or what about the proposed
"Modern Minimum" ahead of us, claimed to be a coming cold period starting
about 2015 and extending to around 2050 with the lowest temperature predicted
about 2035?
And let's not forget the Medieval Maximum period, which research tells
us happened from about 1000 to 1250 A.D. And while we are thinking
about it, why not look up the "Modern Maximum" period which research tells
us will end sometime around 2015.
Now wait just a minute! Why is the information above important?
Simply because all the news we have been reading about the last several
weeks, or hearing on radio or TV, is "climate change" resulting in
"global warming" which helps fuel our drastic forest fires and much of
the climate problems we have experienced lately.
The cause? Well, if not mistaken here, the explanation is nearly
always, "greenhouse gases" caused by the burning of carbon based fuels!
And the remedy? To cut back or eliminate using gasoline, diesel or coal,
by cars or homes or factories, or whatever!
Recall reading last week's RNR where the "Kyoto Agreement" in Japan
in 1997, the climate simulator computer produced by Montana State U. and
a laboratory at Los Alamos, and the "life boat earth" educational exercises
all were discussed. All designed to convince us that drastic changes
had to be made to ensure our future!
But what do we hear from the dissenting side to all of the above?
For starters, it has been argued here that a Creator God would not put
resources on earth which would destroy us by their use! Starving?
Feel free to eat the fruit growing wild on a tree, or the Camas roots you
can find in the ground! Freezing? Feel free to start a fire with
any of the wood found around! Need a modern heater? Do not worry
about using gas, oil, or propane found in
huge quantities around the globe today to heat your home! Or power
your vehicles!
And what say modern expert dissenters? One sample! "The theory
of man-made global warming and climate change based on human greenhouse
gas emissions is the greatest international scientific fraud ever perpetrated
on the world's citizens!" And just who is the "expert" making
this comment? John Casey, whose book DARK WINTER makes this comment
in the first few pages, along with the following predictions: "!)We are
at the end of modern global warming, 2)Solar hibernation is causing a historical
reduction in the energy output of the Sun, 3)A long term drop in
the Earth's average temperature is coming, 4)The next climate change involves
20-30 years of deep and dangerous cold weather." Just who is this
John Casey? Do your own research, or stay with this column one more
week to see just who he is and also to see evidence submitted by other
very credible sources.
Jake Wren |
Home
Classified
Ads
Template Design by:
|